I wrote last year about a controversial new rule by the National
Labor Relations Board (NLRB) requiring private employers to post in their
workplaces an 11x17-inch poster advising employees of their rights under
federal law to form unions, strike, picket, etc. Under the rule an employer’s
failure to post the required notice would have constituted an unfair labor
practice.
The rule, enacted on August 30, 2011, had been expected to apply
to nearly 6 million employers in the U.S., the great majority of which are
small businesses. It never went into effect because litigation was promptly
filed by several business groups challenging its validity.
As
an update I can report that an important federal appellate court has just found
that the NLRB acted illegally in enacting this rule, which the court ordered
vacated.
On May 7, 2013, the Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia in Washington, D.C. found, in the case of National Association of
Manufacturers v. NLRB, that Section 8(c) of the National Labor Relations
Act precludes the Board from finding non-threatening employer speech to be an
unfair labor practice, or evidence of an unfair labor practice, and that the
Board’s new rule violated both prohibitions. The decision was heavily colored
by First Amendment free speech principles, but was based on federal labor law
and not on constitutional grounds.
“[T]he Board’s rule requires employers to disseminate [government]
information, upon pain of being held to have committed an unfair labor
practice,” wrote Senior Judge A. Raymond Randolph for a unanimous three-judge
panel. “But that difference hardly ends the matter. The right to
disseminate another’s speech necessarily includes the right to decide not to
disseminate it.”
“How
… can it be an unfair labor practice,” continued Judge Randolph, “for an
employer to refuse to post a government notice informing employees of their
right to unionize (or to refuse to)? Like the freedom of speech guaranteed in
the First Amendment, Section 8(c) necessarily protects—as against the Board—the
right of employers (and unions) not to speak.”
In another, similar lawsuit, the United States District Court for
the District of South Carolina ruled last year that the Board lacked authority
to promulgate the rule. See Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. NLRB, 856
F. Supp. 2d 778 (D.S.C. 2012). The appeal in that case is now pending before
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Virginia.
It may well be that the U.S. Supreme Court will need to review
this issue. But for the time being employers may ignore the poster rule until
further notice.
No comments:
Post a Comment